Internal disciplinary processes: A basic guide – June 2023
The recent Singapore High Court decision in Lawrence Li See Kit v Debate Association (Singapore) [2023] SGHC 154 ("Lawrence Li See Kit") serves as a useful reminder that maintaining a fair and impartial disciplinary procedure within organisations is critical for fostering trust, respecting the rights of individuals, and ensuring a productive work environment.
Central to this is the concept of natural justice, a legal principle and requirement emphasising fairness, equality, and impartiality. For private organisations that may wish to conduct private disciplinary inquiries and hearings, the development and implementation of fair rules and procedures helps to ensure natural justice is adhered to.
Click here to read more.
分享文章
相关专业知识
相关文章
Injunctions against bond calls: A reminder of the high threshold - TTSJV V BAPCO
Commercial Litigation
Stephenson Harwood wins ‘Disputes Team Of The Year'
International Arbitration
Marine insurance specialist Dr Jennifer Lavelle joins Stephenson Harwood as Partner
Commercial Litigation
When does "warehousing" tip into abuse? Cooke, Young & Keidan LLP v Davis
Commercial Litigation
What next for the FCA ‘s Motor Finance Compensation Scheme?
Financial Services Regulation
Minibonds - still a problem, or problem solved?
Financial Services Regulation
APP fraud, Electronic Money Institutions, derivative claims and Quincecare: more questions than answers in Moorwand v Hamblin
Commercial Litigation
The cost of redress: the evolving role of cost–benefit analysis in certifying opt-out collective actions
Competition Litigation
The UK Market Abuse Regime for Cryptoassets (“MARC”) – the FCA’s final rules
Financial Services Regulation
Court of Appeal upholds solicitor's conviction and clarifies scope of POCA tipping off offence
Regulatory Disputes