Header image

Copy-paste verdicts, the cost of "shortcuts" in arbitration

国际仲裁 | 17/04/2025

The Singapore courts have been regularly recognised for their pro-arbitration stance, rooted in the policy of minimal curial intervention and an attitude of refraining from undue interference with the arbitral process.

A recent judgement of the Singapore Court of Appeal, in DJP and Others v DJO1, confirms that despite the high threshold of set-aside applications, the courts, mindful of the finality and confidentiality in arbitration, remain prepared to take an active role in safeguarding the integrity of the arbitral process.

Click here to read more.

分享文章

相关领域

关于作者

相关文章

Adobestock 1521487712
Dispute Resolution

Partner Terence Seah rejoins Virtus Law, Stephenson Harwood’s Singapore Alliance Firm

了解更多
Adobestock 1156473768
International Arbitration

The challenges and opportunities of arbitrating in Africa

了解更多
Insights Flower Adobestock 1586108781 OVERLAY
Trade & Commodities Disputes

COMMODITIES IN FOCUS WEEKLY ISSUE 147

了解更多
Carousel Images5
International Arbitration

Procedural directions for international arbitration: checklist

了解更多