Header image

Copy-paste verdicts, the cost of "shortcuts" in arbitration

国际仲裁 | 17/04/2025

The Singapore courts have been regularly recognised for their pro-arbitration stance, rooted in the policy of minimal curial intervention and an attitude of refraining from undue interference with the arbitral process.

A recent judgement of the Singapore Court of Appeal, in DJP and Others v DJO1, confirms that despite the high threshold of set-aside applications, the courts, mindful of the finality and confidentiality in arbitration, remain prepared to take an active role in safeguarding the integrity of the arbitral process.

Click here to read more.

分享文章

相关领域

关于作者

Carousel Images11
Dispute Resolution

Stuart Dutson joins Stephenson Harwood as Partner

了解更多
Carousel Images7
Sanctions

The power to vary or revoke a final anti-suit injunction: UniCredit Bank GmbH v RusChemAlliance LLC

了解更多
Carousel Images6
International Arbitration

Avoiding arbitration missteps: Key lessons from a setting aside of an arbitration award for breach of natural justice

了解更多