Judgment handed down in Malik v Malik
Law firm Stephenson Harwood LLP has advised a longstanding client, Mr Malik, on a successful outcome in Malik v Malik [2025] EWHC 2485 (Ch), a heavily-contested jurisdiction challenge arising from a complex family dispute.
The High Court ruled that England was not the appropriate forum (forum conveniens) for the proceedings, that service (if even effected) should be set aside, and further that the claim was strikeable on the grounds of abuse of process.
The Stephenson Harwood team was led by partner Adam Polonsky, who instructed James Kinman of Maitland Chambers. James has appeared in a number of connected applications relating to the underlying claim.
分享文章
相关专业知识
相关文章
Associate Daniel Boon moderates panel on AI replacing human arbitrators at the Regional Arbitral Institutes Forum 2026
Dispute Resolution
Commercial Litigation Partner Nicholas Lum joins Stephenson Harwood in Hong Kong
Commercial Litigation
Data centre construction in 2026: faster, bigger, riskier
Construction & Engineering
Too little too late? The FCA adopts most of the Mills Review’s recommendations, but where are the AI rules?
Commercial, Data & Tech
Foreign injunctions and on-demand bonds: no Ralli Brothers escape route
Commercial Litigation
FCA Consultation Paper proposing reforms of the Senior Managers & Certification Regime
Regulatory Disputes
Renters Rights Act - Can Balance be Achieved?
Dispute Resolution
Default Judgment on Building Liability Orders
Dispute Resolution
AI literacy for board directors: seven rules for using AI tools safely
Dispute Resolution
Injunctions against bond calls: A reminder of the high threshold - TTSJV V BAPCO
Commercial Litigation