DIFC Courts address abolition of the DIFC-LCIA Arbitration Centre
For the first time, the DIFC Courts have provided welcome clarification on some of the issues generated by Decree No. 34 of 2021 and the fallout from the abolishment of the DIFC-LCIA and EMAC.
This was provided in the landmark decision of Narciso v Nash, in which members of Stephenson Harwood's Dubai-based disputes team – partner Mark Lakin, managing associate Magda Kofluk, and associates Samantha Martin and Mayss Akasheh - acted for the Claimant.
Please click here to read the full article.
分享文章
相关专业知识
相关文章
APP fraud, Electronic Money Institutions, derivative claims and Quincecare: more questions than answers in Moorwand v Hamblin
Commercial Litigation
Solving the split incentive in maritime decarbonisation: Who invests? Who benefits?
Maritime Decarbonisation
The cost of redress: the evolving role of cost–benefit analysis in certifying opt-out collective actions
Competition Litigation
More than procurement: how Saudi Arabia’s New Government Tenders and Procurement Law supports Vision 2030
Projects, Energy & Infrastructure
FCA proposes substantial relaxation of remuneration rules for fund managers
Employee Incentives
The UK Market Abuse Regime for Cryptoassets (“MARC”) – the FCA’s final rules
Financial Services Regulation
FCA focuses on governance and outsourcing in review of asset managers’ and alternative firms’ financial crime controls
Regulatory & Investigations
Sanctions, export controls and other trade restrictions: Overcompliance in a conflict-of-laws era- why "when in doubt, don't perform" may no longer be the safest strategy
Corporate