Arbitration—set aside—illegality—common mistake—Hong Kong public policy (AI v LG II LG III)
Arbitration analysis: The plaintiffs (the claimants in the arbitration) in the case made an application before the Court of First Instance requesting the setting side of arbitral awards on the grounds under Article 34(2)(a)(ii), (iii) and Article 34(2)(b)(ii) of the Model Law) claiming the tribunal failed to deal with issues regarding the underlying agreements were claimed to be void for illegality or common mistake. Written by Andrew Rigden Green, partner, head of international arbitration, Greater China at Stephenson Harwood at Stephenson Harwood.
This article was first published by LexisNexis on 31 May 2023.
Click here to read more.
分享文章
相关专业知识
相关文章
Revision to the ICC Rules –2026 Edition
International Arbitration
Partners named in India Business Law Journal's 'International A-List' 2026
Corporate
How to Engage Successfully with Regulators: Ten top tips
Commercial Litigation
Partner Terence Seah rejoins Virtus Law, Stephenson Harwood’s Singapore Alliance Firm
Dispute Resolution
The challenges and opportunities of arbitrating in Africa
International Arbitration
COMMODITIES IN FOCUS WEEKLY ISSUE 147
Trade & Commodities Disputes
Procedural directions for international arbitration: checklist
International Arbitration
Stuart Dutson joins Stephenson Harwood as Partner
Dispute Resolution
Copy-paste verdicts, the cost of "shortcuts" in arbitration
International Arbitration
Arbitration Act 2025
International Arbitration