Copy-paste verdicts, the cost of "shortcuts" in arbitration

国际仲裁 | 17/04/2025

The Singapore courts have been regularly recognised for their pro-arbitration stance, rooted in the policy of minimal curial intervention and an attitude of refraining from undue interference with the arbitral process.

A recent judgement of the Singapore Court of Appeal, in DJP and Others v DJO1, confirms that despite the high threshold of set-aside applications, the courts, mindful of the finality and confidentiality in arbitration, remain prepared to take an active role in safeguarding the integrity of the arbitral process.

Click here to read more.

分享文章

贡献者

John Zadkovich

Partner

新加坡

Aloysius Liu

Associate

新加坡

Partner Terence Seah rejoins Virtus Law, Stephenson Harwood’s Singapore Alliance Firm

Dispute Resolution

Copy-paste verdicts, the cost of "shortcuts" in arbitration

分享文章

相关专业知识

贡献者

John Zadkovich

Aloysius Liu

相关文章

Revision to the ICC Rules –2026 Edition

Partners named in India Business Law Journal's 'International A-List' 2026

How to Engage Successfully with Regulators: Ten top tips

Partner Terence Seah rejoins Virtus Law, Stephenson Harwood’s Singapore Alliance Firm