Copy-paste verdicts, the cost of "shortcuts" in arbitration

The Singapore courts have been regularly recognised for their pro-arbitration stance, rooted in the policy of minimal curial intervention and an attitude of refraining from undue interference with the arbitral process.

A recent judgement of the Singapore Court of Appeal, in DJP and Others v DJO1, confirms that despite the high threshold of set-aside applications, the courts, mindful of the finality and confidentiality in arbitration, remain prepared to take an active role in safeguarding the integrity of the arbitral process.

Click here to read more.