The King’s Speech 2026 confirmed that the Government will introduce a Nuclear Regulation Bill (Bill) in the next parliamentary session. According to a background briefing paper1 published alongside the speech, the Bill is intended to deliver a “new era of British nuclear” by modernising how nuclear projects are planned, regulated and delivered — while maintaining high standards of safety and environmental protection.
The Bill is being introduced to implement the recommendations of the findings2 of the independent Nuclear Regulatory Taskforce led by John Fingleton (the Fingleton Review). The Fingleton Review delivered a blunt, yet accurate diagnosis of the UK nuclear regulatory environment. It found the system "overly complex" and "bureaucratic”, with a single nuclear project potentially subject to oversight from up to six regulators in the civil sector and as many as eight in the defence sector — each operating under separate statutory duties, with no designated lead regulator responsible for resolving conflicts or driving pace. In the Government's own assessment, this has made the UK “the most expensive place in the world to build nuclear projects”. The Bill is the legislative vehicle to change that.
According to the background briefing paper, the Bill will:
Addressing the underlying barriers causing the UK to be an expensive place to construct nuclear assets. If ultimately passed by Parliament, the following key aspects of enabling reform should, in due course, be implemented:
The announcement of the Bill reinforces several recent pledges the UK Government has made.
Developers and operators of existing and potential nuclear projects should expect a meaningful reduction in regulatory friction over the medium term. That said, the 2026–2027 implementation window will be a period of transitional uncertainty.
EPC contractors and supply chain participants will benefit from the shift towards alignment with international regulatory standards, and the reduction in bespoke UK requirements that have historically added cost and time to projects.
For investors and lenders, the emphasis on proportionate, outcomes-focused regulation and quicker decision-making should, over time, improve profitability and bankability. That said, transitional risk during implementation may need to be priced and contractually allocated.
The Bill's introduction will mark the start of an implementation pathway extending through to the end of 2027. Several developments will materially shape how the new regime operates in practice:
We will provide updates as these milestones unfold.
The announcement of the Bill confirms that we should expect a material reset of the UK nuclear regulatory landscape. If delivered as described, regulatory reforms should increase pace, predictability and proportionality — key determinants of cost and bankability — without diluting safety and environmental protections – protections that make the sector financeable in the first place. For developers and investors, the opportunity is significant. The challenge will be in execution —translating legislative ambition into day to day decisions, capacity on the ground and defensible regulatory records. For those outside of the UK, in particular regulators and policy makers considering nuclear energy, the Bill (and the Fingleton Review) may also help them to curate more efficient policies which may engender more foreign investment in the sector.
1 The King’s Speech 2026: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6a046665c0cc74b4523e4d3b/The_King_s_Speech_2026_-_background_briefing_notes.pdf
2 See ‘Nuclear Regulatory Review 2025’: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/692080f75c394e481336ab89/nuclear-regulatory-review-2025.pdf
Partner
London
Partner - Head of Energy Transition and Infrastructure
London
Partner
London
Of Counsel
London
Senior Knowledge Lawyer
London
Partner
Singapore
Partner
Singapore
Associate
Singapore