Managing litigation risk: Cmmercial and Corporate disputes

Welcome to the resource hub for our "Managing litigation risk: Corporate and commercial disputes" event on 10 October 2023.

Here you can view the slides, recordings and materials from the day as well as find out more about our corporate and commercial disputes team. We would be happy to continue the conversations around the topics discussed at the conference and to hear your feedback.

Recordings

Please click on the links below to view recordings from the morning sessions:

• Practical guide to contractual termination
• Privilege – best practice on how to manage concurrent litigation and investigations
• Strategy and settlement (including NDR)
  
• Limitation – how to avoid the common pitfalls

Relevant articles

See below for a link to our recent articles on the topics covered at the event. You can also visit our corporate and commercial disputes hub for a wide range of content on corporate and commercial dispute issues.

Termination

We are never ever getting back together: getting termination notices right

When can you terminate a contract for failing to obtain 'confirmed financing'? (Havila v Abarca)

Take care when terminating: James Kemball Ltd v "K" Line (Europe) Ltd

Contractual termination: Avoiding problems

Limitation

Section 32 of the Limitation Act: multiple lies, multiple limitation periods? (Seedo v El Gamal)

Limitation in finance litigation: What would the reasonably diligent investor do?

Limitation in professional negligence: (Sciortino v Beaumont and Elliot v Hattens)

When can a claim be amended outside the limitation period? (Mulalley & Co v Martlet Homes)

Privilege

It’s an absolute privilege …

Privilege in the spotlight: Al Sadeq v Dechert LLP

Litigation privilege: Loreley v Credit Suisse

Inadvertent waiver of privilege and concerns over independence: Pickett v Balkind

Settlement

Releasing all claims means… releasing all claims (Maranello Rosso v Lohomij BV)

Resolving dispute resolution disputes: when will ADR provisions be unenforceable?