Related Articles
On 21 November 2025, the London Stock Exchange (the "LSE") published its Feedback Statement which summarises the key feedback it received on its earlier Discussion Paper: Shaping the Future of AIM (our summary of which can be found here) and sets out a roadmap for the reform and future developments of AIM.
The feedback reaffirmed AIM’s continued importance within the UK’s capital market landscape and highlighted the opportunity for AIM to support the next generation of growth companies. However, consensus focused on the need for AIM to reposition itself if it is to clearly distinguish itself from the Main Market following its own reforms.
In addition, the LSE has announced its intention to consult separately on several proposed changes to the AIM Rule and the role of the nominated advisers in H1 2026. In the meantime, a series of immediate adjustments will be implemented either by derogation request (which will be considered by a case-by-case basis) or by updates to existing guidance.
The key developments are set out below:
Dual class share structures in line with current Main Market requirements will be accepted for prospective AIM companies. The LSE has recognised that dual class share structures should be a feature of AIM as these structures are designed to encourage entrepreneurs to take their companies public.
Nominated advisers will no longer be required to provide a "fair and reasonable" view on directors’ remuneration, provided they are satisfied that the contractual terms for remuneration which are not part of the standard remuneration package- such as good leaver/bad leaver terms- provide reasonable commercial protections for the company.
Where a nominated adviser can demonstrate to AIM Regulation that an acquisition exceeding 100% of the class tests does not fundamentally change the business, AIM Regulation may determine that an acquisition is a substantial transaction (pursuant to AIM Rule 12) and not a reverse takeover so an admission document will not be required. However, the LSE notes that pending rule changes, shareholder approval may be required for such a substantial transaction.
Additionally, where both parties in a reverse takeover are publicly traded companies, subject to the availability of public information, AIM Regulation will consider whether alternative disclosures could be included in an admission document, instead of the full Schedule Two requirements.
Furthermore, AIM regulation will consider not imposing an automatic suspension of trading if a reverse takeover is in contemplation, where it can be demonstrated that appropriate alternative disclosure can be made.
Having noted that AIM should not be more onerous than the Main Market, the LSE has proposed (i) amendments to increase the class test threshold for substantial transactions (AIM Rule 12) from 10% to 25%; (ii) the removal of the Profits class test (except for related party transactions); and (iii) permitting a pro-rata Gross Capital class test for investing companies where the acquisition does not result in control and/or consolidation. Derogations from the class tests can be requested pending formal redrafting of the AIM Rules.
Historical Financial Statements - the LSE will consider derogation requests from nominated advisors for historical financial information to be incorporated by reference, provided that information is readily available to investors and will remain so on an ongoing basis.
Accounting Standards – recognising that UK GAAP (FRS 102) is the accounting standard commonly used by UK companies, derogation requests will be considered to enable the use of UK GAAP (FRS 102), as well as other local accounting standards on a case-by-case basis where equivalency to IFRS can be explained.
Secondary issues – Pending changes to the AIM rules, the LSE will consider derogation requests from nominated advisors to dispense with the publication of an admission document for the admission to trading of a second line of securities.
Further issues – following the introduction of the new public offers and admissions to trading regime in January 2026, no admission document is required for further issues.
In addition to the above, the LSE has confirmed that it will be carrying out further review in respect of the following:
The LSE is considering revisions to the general disclosure rule under AIM Rule 11 to address feedback that many are duplicative of the UK MAR disclosure regime, while ensuring that nominated advisers remain involved with respect to disclosure.
The LSE is seeking to restore the nominated adviser’s primary role as a strategic adviser focused on corporate finance, rather than serving as a compliance function. To further reflect the nominated adviser’s importance in the adviser model, its involvement in the Qualified Executive approval process will be expanded. The LSE will be engaging with firms on a new technical note in H1 2026 to help reset the expectations for the nominated adviser role.
The AIM admission document is to be redesigned to be more proportionate and user-friendly for both companies and investors, including a reconsideration of the inclusion of a working capital statement and the introduction of incorporation by reference. Feedback showed support for an admission document that simplified and focused on the material disclosures that are of interest to investors.
The LSE is evaluating the secondary market trading infrastructure, with the possibility of introducing trading halts for secondary fundraisings to reduce transaction risks and to enable more open discussions with the wider group of potential investors which would not normally be wall-crossed. As part of its review, the LSE will evaluate the approach taken in international markets and the process an AIM company and its nominated adviser would need to follow to request a trading halt.
The LSE is looking to enhance AIM’s digital presence and create marketing tools and resources for all stakeholder to support their route to AIM.
The LSE has also set out the detail behind its ongoing engagement with the UK Government and other regulators to ensure and promote AIM’s future growth, which includes:
It is expected that the LSE will publish a further consultation on the AIM Rule changes and a new technical note for nominated advisers in the first half of 2026. Stakeholders are encouraged to capitalise on the immediate regulatory flexibilities which have been announced, as well as to actively participate in further consultations aimed at shaping and restoring AIM’s competitiveness and relevance.
If you have any questions about the Feedback Statement or would like to discuss its potential impact and any opportunities, please contact our team at: SHCapitalMarkets@stephensonharwood.com.